Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 06:58:55 +0200
Simon Hughes
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 02:53:31 -0700
One would hope that if 4AD was even remotely considering a Mass CD
reissue that a Wolfgang Press CD reissue of "The Burden Of Mules"
would also be an idea the label is pondering. And should the Mass
album get a CD reissue, I hope it includes the sweet and zippy
"You And I"/"Cabbage" 7" single as well!
Here are a few other CD reissues that 4AD could ponder...
BAD 11 CD VARIOUS ARTISTS: Presage(s)
CAD 117 CD VARIOUS ARTISTS: Nature Mortes - Still Lives
JAD 118 CD VARIOUS ARTISTS: Vintage 4AD Singles
Featuring - AXIS 1, 2, 4, AD 10, 101, 102, and 103.
BAD 5 CD REMA REMA: Wheel In The Roses
Or could be tacked onto "The Burden Of Mules" CD...
BAD 115 CD DANCE CHAPTER: The Final Chapter
A compilation of AD 18 and BAD 115.
JAD 202 CD THE BIRTHDAY PARTY/LYDIA LUNCH: Drunk On The Pope's Blood/
The Agony Is The Ecstasy
BAD 203 CD TONES ON TAIL: A Bigger Splash
BAD 215 CD COLOURBOX: Breakdown/Tarantula
BAD 310 CD THIS MORTAL COIL: Song To The Siren
A compilation of AD 310, BAD 310, AD 410, "Acid" from
CAD 703 and previously unreleased tracks, which there
ARE A FEW. Remember when the Rough Trade 7" club was
going to release a 7" devoted to TMC in their first slew
of releases?
BAD 601 CD RICHENEL: L'Esclave Endormi
CADD 607CD THROWING MUSES: Throwing Muses
A compilation of CAD 607, BAD 701, B-Side of MAD 706
and early pre-4AD demo tracks
Of course, this is just a fairy tale list but one can dream, I
suppose! When the Mass CD comes out, I know the feverish Mass
fans (and there must be units of one or at least dozens!) will be
snapping them up like there's no tomorrow!
Jeff Keibel
Toronto, ON
CANADA
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 02:17:03 +0600
Jul 1996 21:05:45 -0700
Srilanka wrote:
> >I will take this opportunity to plug the new Fax
> release by Redeye.
Fred ("elvia") replied:
> All you 4AD types...don't listen to einexile and
> company. Get on the ambient list and buy as you see fit.
> These guys are just trying to be
> "somebodies".
Firstly, we're all einexile's company (except e, himself) so who ARE we going to
listen to? Next, we already buy as we see fit and many of us appreciate a
recommendation or two. Are you saying the new Fax Redeye release is bad?
Please tell us why. Lastly, HUH? "somebodies"???
-cz
but i'm beginning to think that they've both passed their prime (well, that's
been true of CT for a while now). Neither album is the worst or best. A
moderate in our midst ---ACK!
400 the tempers rage? I think we need to name a law (as in, Murphey's law)
after that person.
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 07:22:40 -0700
On Fri, 5 Jul 1996, Elvia M. Tarango wrote:
> At 11:52 PM 7/5/96, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >I will take this opportunity to plug the new Fax release by Redeye.
> >Not for the faint at heart, but if you're looking for
> >something to take your mind off of the endless arguments of 4AD yesteryear, I
> >would suggest this as a starter.
> >jason
> All you 4AD types...don't listen to einexile and company. Get on the
> ambient list and buy as you see fit. These guys are just trying to be
> "somebodies".
Erm...and what exactly is a nobody? A person who fails to make waves on a
400 member mailing list?
I don't see why this is called for. A select few ambient artists have
become thislisty and this increases as 4adlites grow more interested in
the genre. I don't see why recommending some good records to like minded
people calls for yet another lame insult from you. It's not like anyone
here needs your permission or encouragement to ignore a recommendation,
but thanks anyway, I'm sure.
I don't see why you even bother reading or posting to these lists. It's
become pretty clear that you resent just about everyone; I think we've
all probably figured that out by now...so you really can change the
subject any time.
e
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 11:01:02 -0400
<< All you 4AD types...don't listen to einexile and company. Get on the
ambient list and buy as you see fit. These guys are just trying to be
"somebodies".
Fred Collins >>
"Somebodies" recommending a new release that I liked. Yes,
hmmm...recommendation-- oh the humanity :(
jason
[email protected]
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 13:16:10 -0400
I was at Arcana Books in Santa Monica a few weeks ago and I asked the guy
at the counter if they had This Rimy River. He said they didn't have it,
but now I think I should have asked if they had the regular edition. How
hard is it to get the regular edition? In the Philadelphia area, the only
place I've seen it is at a Tower Records store, selling for $65. I didn't
think it was worth that much.
I did get the v23 1996 calendar at Arcana, in the end.
--- Lucius Kwok ([email protected]) ---
http://astro.temple.edu/~lucius
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 19:32:02 +0200
My email address is: [email protected]
grant
..
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 13:28:17 -0700
Einexile the geek wrote:
>
>I don't see why you even bother reading or posting to these lists. It's
>become pretty clear that you resent just about everyone; I think we've
>all probably figured that out by now...so you really can change the
>subject any time.
>
> e
I suspect that only 1 to 10% of the population of both list email. Of that
population, a very young constituence writes opinions as if they are
fact...like your weak self. I am very bothered by this. You take the
attitude that the sun revolves around you rather than around the
populus...the list.
I right because I have the right to agree or disagree with what is said.
Why do you write on this list? To be heard....? I am just trying to give
the people on this list as much exposure to other lists as possible. I
always try to give sources as such, not as my own made up ego. As your
last post on the ambient list, were you quote an author in length, but fail
to sight said author. A classic example of pure ego at work...in reality
it's called plagrasim.
Fred "Give the People The Source" Collins
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 17:59:55 -0500
i like the name rollerskate skinny and 'horsedrawn wishes'even more so, but i
hated the cd. go figure.
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 18:12:53 -0500
hey man, don't be dragging the kitchens into this!
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 17:11:04 -0700
On Sat, 6 Jul 1996, Elvia M. Tarango wrote:
> I suspect that only 1 to 10% of the population of both list email. Of that
> population, a very young constituence writes opinions as if they are
> fact...like your weak self. I am very bothered by this. You take the
> attitude that the sun revolves around you rather than around the
> populus...the list.
funny, but you seem to be obsessed with sweet ol' e. more often than
not, you insult him or his opinions as if you had nothing better to do.
he doesn't think the world revolves around him {nor the sun, which
is what the planets revolve around in our solar system}. however, you
assume such because that would only lend fuel to your fire..so you can
provoke him on a mailing list and {this is all conjecture, mind you}
make your mark as The E Flamer.
> I right because I have the right to
> agree or disagree with what is said.
> Why do you write on this list? To be heard....?
you answered your own question {tho, you misspelled write}...
> I am just trying to give
> the people on this list as much exposure to other lists as possible. I
> always try to give sources as such,
so, if e quotes a review in alternative press, would that makes things
all better?
> not as my own made up ego.
uh...is your name elvia or fred?
> As your
> last post on the ambient list, were you quote an author in length, but fail
> to sight said author. A classic example of pure ego at work...in reality
> it's called plagrasim.
it may also be called forgetfulness. you assume too easily, and that can
get you into trouble. just because someone refers to another's
quotes/writings/etc. doesn't mean they are plagiarizing that person.
if that were the case, warren defever would have been sued years ago.
> Fred "Give the People The Source" Collins
everyone, including you {unfortunate as it may be}, is entitled to his
or her own opinions. everyone {at least in this country} has the freedom
of speech. apparently, what would make you happy is if e would
completely censor himself, his opinions, his thoughts...
you're quite the oppressor, aren't you?
or perhaps you are just jealous?
i still like the obsession theory, though...
girly of the people,
kelli-jeanne